Judicial review, injunctions and appeals

Simon Eastwood

Senior Consultant & LEAD CONTACT
  • London
  • Professional Discipline; Regulatory; Sports Law; Employment
  • 020 7484 7594
View profile

Applications for injunctions, judicial review and appeals – how we can help

Hempsons’ team of experienced defence lawyers is regularly involved in applications for injunctions, judicial review and appeals, particularly in respect of decisions by regulatory and disciplinary tribunals. Our solicitors frequently advise clients on the merits of challenging unfair or unlawful decisions at a local level (e.g employing bodies) or in the First Tier Tribunal, Upper Tribunal, High Court or Court of Appeal. Our expertise as judicial review and appeal lawyers allows us to guide clients through these complex and lengthy proceedings to achieve the best outcome.

Time is of the essence

If you have been at the receiving end of a decision which you think is/was unlawful and should be challenged, time is of the essence. The courts impose strict deadlines for appeals and judicial reviews and will rarely give you any leeway if you are late in commencing proceedings. With appeals, the time limit is usually 21 days, although if you are appealing a decision by a body such as the GMC or GDC, it is 28 days. For judicial reviews the deadline is 3 months after the decision you wish to challenge, although the rules make clear that the claim should be commenced as soon as practicably possible and leaving it to the last minute is rarely advisable. Putting together legal challenges of this nature is time-consuming and far from straightforward, so it is essential that you seek advice as soon as possible. Contact us today and we will act promptly and efficiently to ensure your rights are protected.

Appeals against decisions of regulatory bodies

Hempsons has years of experience of defending professionals facing regulatory proceedings before bodies such as the GMC, GDC and HCPC. In that context, we have advised numerous doctors, dentists and other professionals in relation to appeals against decisions made by their regulators or employers, leading to appeals at a more local level (e.g. within the framework of NHS hospitals’ internal disciplinary procedures), in addition to statutory appeals in the High Court and appeals to the First Tier Tribunal. Our involvement starts from advising as to the merits of pursuing an appeal (seeking advice from experienced Counsel where necessary); and where there are merits, representing clients in the appeal itself. We have a proven track record of succeeding in such appeals, notable examples of which include:

Walker-Smith v GMC [2012] EWHC 503 (Admin)

Appeal against a GMC Fitness to Practise Panel finding of serious professional misconduct, relating to research in the late 1990s, which looked into a possible link between the triple vaccine for MMR and the occurrence of autism and bowel disease in young children.

Robin Edward Lawrence v GMC [2012] EWHC 464 (Admin)

Appeal against the decision of a GMC Fitness to Practise Panel to erase the name of a consultant psychiatrist from the medical register, where it was concluded that the rules of natural justice precluded members of specialist tribunals, including experts, from giving evidence to themselves which the parties had no opportunity to challenge. It was held that the Panel had erred in relying upon expertise which it did not possess and reaching conclusions on particular issues without first identifying those issues or giving the parties an opportunity to adduce evidence or make submissions on them.

Barry Anthony Rimmer -v- General Dental Council [2012] 124 BMLR 40

Appeal of decision of the General Dental Council Professional Conduct Committee in relation to responsibility for keeping adequate sedation records.

Emmanuel v (1) South Gloucestershire PCT and (2) FHSAA [2009] EWHC 3260 (Admin)

Appeal against a decision of the FHSAA to uphold the decision of a PCT to remove a GP’s name from its Performers’ List. The judge allowed the appeal on the grounds that the FHSAA had acted unlawfully in not calling the PCT’s key witness/complainant to give oral evidence.

Judicial reviews and injunctions

Hempsons has considerable experience of pursuing injunctions (to prevent a course of action being taken) and judicial reviews (to reverse erroneous decisions). Often, we are able to resolve the issues in question in pre-action correspondence. In other words, if we have advised a client that an application for an injunction of judicial review is likely to succeed, more often than not we are able to secure the desired result by writing a letter to the other side which sets out our arguments and effectively threatens to take formal action – and that often leads to us securing the result without the need for court proceedings, which is usually in our client’s best interests.

Where necessary, however, we will pursue court proceedings, and again we have a proven track record of success in doing so, working with highly-experienced Counsel from leading sets of chambers. Notable cases include:

R (on the application of Sosanya) v GMC [2009] EWHC 2814 (Admin)

Successful judicial review (and simultaneous statutory appeal) of a decision of the GMC’s Interim Orders Panel (IOP) to suspend a doctor on the GP Vocational Training Scheme, pending the outcome of a criminal prosecution. Now widely cited in support of the need for tribunals considering interim orders to provide proper reasons for their decisions.

Chakrabarty (Claimant) -v- Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust (Defendant) & National Clinical Assessment [2014] Med LR 379 : [2015] 141 BMLR 86

High Court challenge in relation to the fairness of a doctor being referred for an NHS capability hearing, under the “Maintaining High Professional Standards” (MHPS) framework.

Criminal appeals

Hempsons regularly represents clients in Crown Court or Magistrates’ Court trials, and has a proven track record of securing acquittals for clients facing serious allegations. We are also well-placed to assist you with an appeal if you are convicted of an offence, particularly given our relationship with barristers widely-regarded as leaders in the field. As with any other appeal, time is of the essence if you wish to challenge a conviction, so contact us as soon as possible and we will give you the advice and support you need.

In addition to challenging convictions, there are also occasions when the Crown/prosecution might consider the decision of a Crown Court judge to be wrong. An example might be where we have succeeded in convincing the judge that there is “no case to answer”, meaning the case is thrown out at the close of the prosecution case, without the defendant needing to present their case at all (a result we have achieved for several clients over the years). It is open to the prosecution to challenge such decisions in the Criminal Court of Appeal, and we can assist you in resisting any such challenge. An example of our success in that regard was in the case of  R v Rudling [2016] EWCA Crim 741, which followed the successful acquittal of a GP charged with Gross Negligence Manslaughter.

PeopleView all

  • Chambers UK 2016
    “[Adam is]praised for his “all-round ability.”
  • Chambers UK 2017
    “[Adam is] a real thinker... If you have a problem case, he can find a way to tackle it.”
  • Chambers UK 2018
    “He’s unflappable, calm and level-headed. He’s good at managing the stress of the client.”
  • Chambers UK 2019
    “I would describe him as being great in a case analysis – he has a very intellectual, careful and cautious approach, and he is great at determining strategy.”
  • Chambers UK 2020
    “Very astute, switched-on and practical.”
  • Medical Client 2020
    “My sincere thanks to Adam Smith and team, who rose above the call of duty to help me successfully pull through my most stressful and darkest hour, with them you are not only in safe hands but experts as well.”
  • Client following HCPC hearing 2020
    “Adam you smashed it out the Park, when the panel retired I knew it would be a good result... No stone unturned.”
  • Medical Client 2020
    “I am very grateful for your support and professionalism throughout, which made a potentially traumatic and stressful experience considerably less so.”
  • Medical Client 2020
    “I cannot thank you enough for your empathic and brilliant defence by you and the team…Adam, thanks a lot as I realise you orchestrated everything with an astute thoroughness.”
  • Dental Client 2020
    “I cannot begin to describe how reassured I was by your handling of the case at all times. I was extremely lucky, as I had the best possible legal team and I am fully aware of that…I am thoroughly indebted to you for going that extra mile on my behalf.”
  • Chambers UK 2016
    ““[Simon is] a vigorous and effective advocate” who is “very able and thorough.” “He continues to be highly regarded for his representation of healthcare practitioners."”
  • Chambers UK 2017
    “[Simon has] robust advice combined with tactical awareness and a good client manner. He is well regarded in the marketplace for his representation of medical professionals facing disciplinary proceedings.
  • Chambers UK 2018
    “He’s very experienced and knows the regulation of medical professionals inside out. He’s very thorough and very knowledgeable.”
  • Chambers UK 2020
    “Simon Eastwood is a standout lawyer who is well known for defending healthcare professionals before the GDC and GMC. Sources say: “He is hugely experienced. What he doesn’t know about regulatory work isn’t worth knowing.”
  • 2016
    “Friendly, unpretentious and prepared to work hard to achieve results.”
  • Chambers UK 2017
    “[He is] ‘a very astute and thoughtful tactician’ with sources commending his ability to ‘identify the real issues and consequences of problems and devise the appropriate strategy.”
  • Chambers UK 2018
    “[Stephen is]…very bright, very clever and works incredibly well with clients, counsel and legal experts”
  • Chambers UK 2019
    “He is very loyal to his clients, very tenacious and absolutely dedicated.”
  • Chambers UK 2020
    “[Stephen Hooper] asks the right questions and takes a systematic approach.”
  • Medical Client 2020
    “My very sincere thanks to you for your calm and reasoned approach, your thoroughness and prompt communications. You made a distressing episode considerably more manageable.”
  • Medical Client 2020
    “Just a brief note to say a very big thank you for all of your highly professional and skilled advice during the last 5 months not forgetting the day of the inquest itself….Many thanks once again for your excellent and superb service.”
  • Dental Client 2020
    “As I have said after the committee decision, I couldn’t have asked for a better lawyer.
  • Dental Client 2020
    “Thank you for your support that has gone at times also beyond the strictly professional boundaries to act both as a friend and a legal counsellor.”
  • Medical Client 2020
    “We have found Stephen to be approachable, reassuring, supportive, appropriately direct, thorough, to have offered wise counsel and to have dealt with our insecurities and concerns with patience and care no matter how irrational – and as GPs we know how irrational people’s concerns can be. We thought you should know how grateful we are that he was assigned to us.”
  • Medical Client Student 2020
    “I wanted to say a big thank you for all your help during the case. Your help during that difficult time was so vital for me getting back on the course and getting to where I am now.”
  • Barrister 2020
    “I particularly wanted to tell you how impressive I found Stephen to be. In fact, he has to be one of the best solicitors I have ever worked with. He is intelligent, perceptive, efficient, knowledgeable and extremely good with people.”
  • Legal 500 2017
    “Stephen is described as] an ‘imaginative’ associate with a ‘refreshing approach to legal problems.”
  • Legal 500 2020
    “Stephen Hooper is thoughtful, hardworking, and approachable.”
  • Chambers UK 2013
    “Huge commitment and passion for the job without being unrealistic about what can be achieved... [He is] entirely straightforward, and he fights very hard for his client. He’s the ideal solicitor.”
  • Chambers UK 2017
    “The highly experienced Surjit Dubb receives praise for his proficiency in "managing the case and the anxiety of the doctor."”
  • Chambers UK 2018
    “He has an excellent manner with clients. He’s very realistic and very down-to-earth.”
  • Chambers UK 2019
    “He’s a very thoughtful solicitor who thinks strategically and tactically.”
  • Criminal Client 2020
    “Thank you so much for fighting for me, for your professionalism and for your patience. I cannot thank you enough.”
  • Medical Client 2020
    “Please pass on my heartfelt thanks to your team for all of the hard work, kindness and patience that you have shown me over the course of what has been a testing 5 years.”
  • Medical Client 2020
    “Just a big thank you for all of your help, support, advice and guidance over the last 2 years. I was delighted to receive the news that the GMC will be closing their investigation with no further action. I am grateful to you. In you I had the best defence team. Surjit – you are an excellent, caring, compassionate and very supportive solicitor and simply the best. I would recommend you to anyone.”
  • Legal 500 2018
    “Has unmatched client care and attention to detail.”
  • Legal 500 2020
    “Surjit is a cool, calm strategist who inspires confidence in his clients and fear in his opponents.”