Revalidation – a trap for the unwary?

All doctors will be aware of the need to revalidate and the GMC’s responsibilities in this regard.  Revalidation is the process by which doctors are required to demonstrate that they are up to date and fit to practise.  Doctors must revalidate every five years, and in order to do so they must have annual appraisals based on the GMC’s guidance, Good Medical Practice.

For most doctors, appraisals and revalidation are straightforward.  If you are employed by an NHS Trust (even if you also have a private practice), that Trust is likely to be your Designated Body (DB) and you will have a Responsible Officer (RO) – often the Medical Director of your employing Trust.  If you are a GP on the Performers List, your DB will be NHS England and your RO will be based in your local Area Team.  Purely private doctors have a number of other options for their DB, including the private hospital where they work or have practising privileges, the Independent Doctors Federation, and some of the Royal College Faculties.

However, there are doctors who have trouble identifying a DB and RO, perhaps because their practice is unusual in some way.  This can lead to difficulties.

It is open to doctors in this situation to find a “Suitable Person” – someone who has been approved by the GMC and who can make a revalidation recommendation to the GMC about you.  The GMC publishes a list of Suitable Persons (SPs) on their website.  It is well worth exploring this option if you do not have a DB and RO, as your SP will be able to assess your fitness to practise in your chosen field, which may be unusual or very niche.

If you do not have a DB/RO or an SP, the final option is to submit an annual revalidation return to the GMC, which will include evidence about your practice and your annual appraisal (which can be done by an independent provider of medical appraisals).  In addition, you will need to take an exam every five years.  This assessment is provided by the GMC, and there is a fee, which is currently £1,100.  There are 12 different assessments and you would need to choose the assessment most relevant to your area of practice.  That is where the difficulty often lies – almost by definition, someone who does not have a DB/RO or an SP tends not to fit into a neat category or work in one of the more mainstream specialties.  That may make it difficult for you to pass the GMC’s assessment in one of the 12 areas they offer (which are: Anaesthetics, Emergency medicine, General practice, Histopathology, Medicine, Obstetrics and gynaecology, Ophthalmology, Paediatrics, Psychiatry, Radiology, Surgery, and a Foundation paper for doctors who do not practice in a specialty area). If you fail the assessment, the GMC will take steps to withdraw your licence to practise and it will be stressful, time consuming and expensive to appeal that decision.  If you are having difficulty finding a DB/RO, you may therefore want to explore the possibly of finding an SP, rather than submitting to the GMC’s revalidation return and assessment system.

Whatever option you choose, if your RO or SP makes a recommendation to the GMC that you should not be revalidated (a notification of non-engagement), you will face the prospect of the GMC taking steps to withdraw your licence to practise.  The first step is that the GMC will send you a notice of their intention to withdraw your licence, and if you want to challenge this you must respond within 28 days and provide them with as much additional evidence as possible (the notice will tell you what’s required).  It is essential that you do so within the time limit – you may be able to persuade the GMC to defer their decision and give you more time, or even to change their decision and revalidate you.  The alternative is to accept withdrawal of your licence to practise, without which you cannot work as a doctor in the UK.  If the GMC decide to withdraw your licence, even after you have provided additional information in response to their notice, you will have the right to appeal that decision (on the papers or at an oral hearing).  There is a 28 day time limit to lodge that appeal.

There are often good grounds for challenging a decision by the GMC to withdraw a doctor’s license – it may be that the doctor has been unable to engage with revalidation because of illness or other mitigating circumstances, or it may be that they have done what was required but not provided the necessary information or presented it clearly enough.  Sometimes, doctors are lulled into a false sense of security because they pass their annual appraisals, but they are not in fact doing all that they need to do to enable their RO to recommend revalidation.  If that is the case, the RO (or someone else on their behalf) should contact the doctor and let them know that there is a problem.  You should be proactive and ensure that before your revalidation date, you contact your RO (if you have not heard from them), and ensure that they are happy with the information you have provided.  Make sure that the GMC have your up-to-date contact details – they will send you a formal notice four months before your revalidation date and this will serve as a useful reminder to you.

We hope that you sail through your five-yearly revalidations without difficulty – but if you should ever need any legal assistance, specialist lawyers such as the team at Hempsons will be able to assist.

NewsView all

  • A change to informed consent

    The days when medical practitioners could assume their indemnifiers would permit them to remain in benefit and unlimited practice have long since departed. High risk practitioners may find the benefits of membership are withdrawn – and buying indemnity elsewhere is challenging. Without it, the GMC will not permit doctors to practice.

    Continue reading
  • Apps and traps: the regulation of software and apps used in healthcare

    I use my smart phone as (amongst other things) a spirit level, a calculator, a camera, a web browser, a dictaphone, a radio, a sat nav, a diary, a clock, an address book, and a messaging device. I also occasionally use it to make phone calls. The remarkable processing power that we carry in our pockets provides a wonderful variety of services and opportunities, and a significant (and rapidly growing) number of applications for smart phones have a health-related dimension.

    Continue reading
  • Brexit – the impact on employment law

    EU legislation and case law has had a huge impact upon UK employment law and so it is very likely that BREXIT will have an impact on employee protection and employee rights but how much of a change are we likely to see?

    Continue reading
  • Clinician incentives – the ‘other’ impact of the private healthcare order

    A flurry of activity in spring this year saw private hospitals adjusting to the reality of the Competition and Markets Authority’s Private Healthcare Market Investigation Order. As a result, consultants have been approached and asked to sign new agreements with the hospitals - the end result for many practitioners is an arrangement which looks quite different from what they have been used to over the years. Here, we explain the changes and the need for compliance.

    Continue reading
  • Protect your goodwill

    In recent years there have been a number of high profile cases in the High Court dealing with the protection of goodwill and the enforceability of restrictive covenants.

    Continue reading
  • Sexual harassment in the workplace

    Private medical or dental practices are often small businesses that involve close working relationships between staff and close contact with patients. Consequently they are at a higher risk of receiving difficult allegations of sexual harassment.

    Continue reading
  • The threat in a letter of claim

    There can be few more frightening events in the professional life of a doctor than to receive a letter from a solicitor proposing to bring an action for compensation from a patient alleging negligence. The recipient should know that this probably heralds the start of an arduous form of mid-career audit. If things go badly there may be public humiliation ahead. This claim could be followed by a complaint to the General Medical Council that may end the doctor’s career. The days have long past when substandard clinical practice was assumed to be something that would be sorted out, often behind closed doors between the patient’s lawyers and those acting for the doctor’s indemnifiers.

    Continue reading
  • To be or not to be – a member of an LLP

    There is a developing trend in the world of Primary Healthcare that “bigger is better”. This is perceived to be the case for a number of different reasons, including perceptions concerning the safeguarding of the business from unwelcome predators, the sharing of staff across a wider patch and perhaps (regarded as the least important in the present marketplace) the ability to “brand” the business.

    Continue reading
  • Unfair dismissal – a sobering case for employers?

    In a case that is of particular relevance to healthcare providers, who have to balance the difficult issue of complying with their duties towards patients and their obligations to staff, an Employment Tribunal (ET) has found that an NHS trust unfairly dismissed an employee for smelling of alcohol on duty. The case provides a helpful reminder for employers on the steps to take when handling concerning staff behaviour to avoid costly litigation.

    Continue reading
  • What does vicarious liability mean in practice?

    It is important that practitioners who are involved in management of employees whether in private practice or NHS practice are aware of the risks of vicarious liability. In private practice, the Practice (and partners) could be held vicariously liable for the actions of salaried GPs and other employees or workers. As the cases below demonstrate courts will apply the principle broadly and it is not just reserved for traditional employment relationships.

    Continue reading